United States District Court · District of Nevada

Nejmeh v. Theriva Biologics, Inc.

A stockholder lawsuit about how Theriva Biologics (NYSE American: TOVX) sought and counted stockholder approval for 16,184,560 warrant shares.

These are allegations. The complaint and motion state the plaintiff's side of a pending case. No court has ruled on the merits, and Theriva has not yet filed its response. Theriva's filings will be posted here when they are filed.

What the case is about

The plaintiff is a Theriva stockholder of about four years. The verified complaint brings two claims:

  1. Federal proxy rules (Section 14(a) and Rule 14a-9). The complaint alleges that Theriva's June 29, 2026 proxy statement told stockholders in one place that Proposal 5, approval to issue up to 16,184,560 warrant shares, was "routine" and that brokers could vote it without instructions, and in another place that it was "non-routine" and that brokers could not. Theriva reported that Proposal 5 passed with 3,665,312 votes for, 2,267,592 against and 10,823,826 broker non-votes.
  2. Nevada corporate law and Theriva's bylaws. The complaint alleges that the December 2025 proxy stated a 34% quorum although the bylaws set one-third, and that at the December 15, 2025 special meeting in Rockville, Maryland, a continuation date of December 22 was announced, which the company did not hold. Three stockholders who attended have given sworn statements about the meeting. Later sessions were held in Spain.

The plaintiff asks the court to preserve the status quo on the warrants while the court reviews the case, to order Theriva to produce its voting and tabulation records, and to declare the parties' rights. The full requests are in the complaint's Prayer for Relief.

Court filings

Copies provided by the plaintiff. The court's own record on PACER is the official version.

Patents

Theriva's publicly identified U.S. patent portfolio, compiled from public USPTO and Google Patents records and Theriva's own SEC filings. These are public records, not court filings. The schedule is an index, not a title opinion, and patent language is not FDA approval or proof of efficacy.

Docket

ECFDateEntry
—Sep 26, 2026Plaintiff's Notice of Compliance with Minute Order (ECF No. 8).
8Sep 23, 2026Minute Order (Judge Traum). The motion warrants expedited consideration. Plaintiff to serve the order and motion by Sept 25 and file a Notice of Compliance; Theriva's response due Sept 29, 2026.
7Sep 22, 2026Plaintiff's Notice and Renewed Demand for Jury Trial under Rule 38.
6Sep 22, 2026Plaintiff's Notice of Administrative Case Classification Discrepancy.
5Sep 17, 2026Summons issued as to Theriva Biologics, Inc.
—Sep 17, 2026Case assigned to District Judge Anne R. Traum and Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney.
4Sep 16, 2026Verified Complaint, with civil cover sheet and exhibits.
3Sep 16, 2026Certificate of Interested Parties.
2Sep 16, 2026Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction.

The official docket is on PACER / CM-ECF for the District of Nevada. If anything here differs from the court's record, the court's record controls.

Public SEC filings cited

Theriva's own filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, which anyone can read for free: